FAQ's Downloads Contact & Feedback Email Subscription Forum Site Map

 Home      Advertisement Search      News      Ministry/Agency Login
Main Menu

Developed by


Printable View  

  Public Procurement Reform in Bangladesh   
  The Government of Bangladesh, as part of the broad public sector reforms, has embarked upon to manage implementation challenges aiming at improving performance of public procurement progressively as part of strengthening overall sectoral governance. In order to achieve its aim and objective, a permanent unit, named as Central Procurement Technical Unit (CPTU) was established in 2002 as implementing unit in the field of procurement reform and reform implementation monitoring. Reform process was carried out with ultimate outcomes of formulation and issuance of a unified procurement processing system (Public Procurement Regulations 2003), Implementation Procedures for PPR 2003, Public Procurement Processing and Approval Procedures (PPPA), Revised Delegation of Financial Powers (DOFP) and several Standard Tender Documents (STD's)/Standard Request for Proposal Document for the procurement of Goods, Works and Services. Later on in 2006, the Public Procurement Act was passed by the Parliament (PPA 2006) and in 2008, a new set of Public Procurement Rules (PPR 2008) was issued. The PPA 2006 and PPR 2008 were made effective on w.e.f. 31 January, 2008.  
  Country Procurement Assessment Report (CPAR) and  the Public Procurement Reform Project (PPRP)  
The slow procurement performance under different projects led to the Country Procurement Assessment of prevailing public procurement policy, framework, institutions and staff skills in 2001. The Country Procurement Assessment Report (CPAR) which was prepared by World Bank, in agreement with the Government of Bangladesh, identified many deficiencies, including the following major deficiencies, in the procurement system of the Government of Bangladesh:
  Absence of sound legal framework governing public sector procurement
  Complex bureaucratic procedure causing delay
  Absence of planning
  Multiple layers in the approval and review process
  Lack of adequate professional competence of staff to manage public procurement
  Generally poor quality bidding documents and bid evaluation
    Ineffective administration of contracts  
  Absence of adequate mechanism for ensuring transparency and accountability.

With the above backdrop, the need for improving governance in the public procurement management area was felt. The first "Public Procurement Reform Project" with IDA assistance approved on 14 February 2002 clearly defined its implementation objectives as to 'contribute to improved performance in public   procurement through introduction of measures to make the public procurement system compliant with internationally agreed norms for efficiency, transparency and accountability with the increase of procurement capacity through training and creation of a pool of national procurement professionals.

more ...

FAQ's      Downloads      Contact & Feedback      Email Subscription      Forum      Site Map